For the 2017-18 season, I think the most recent two games easily represent the starkest contrast between the good Hurricanes that are in a playoff spot and the bad Hurricanes that are still lurking in the shadows. Even adjusting for the fact that the Penguins are still struggling to find their game in 2017-18, the 4-0 win over the Penguins was an impressive wire to wire win. Two days later, the team follows it up with what I have termed debacle v2.0 with a 7-1 loss in a game that was over by the end of the first period. The game could be trumped only by the 8-1 loss to the Toronto Maple Leafs a couple weeks back.
If I had to come up with one takeaway from this game, I think it comes directly from the game preview. I said:
It is up to Justin Williams and the team’s captains to rattle the sword a little bit to make sure that everyone recognizes that Thursday’s level of play is something that is earned not just granted.
The Hurricanes missed in this regard. A potential silver lining is that they did not halfway get away with it. Instead, the hockey gods punished the Canes mercilessly which has the potential to make a bigger impression and therefore generate a greater learning experience.
Context is important
By no means do I want to suggest that what happened on Saturday was okay. It was not.
But I do think a dose of context is important right now. The loss obviously only counts once despite the brutal score. And one game is not enough to take away what the team has accomplished climbing the standings ladder recently.
Meh…Regardless of final score @NHLCanes will wake up on Sunday morning in a playoff spot.
— Canes and Coffee (@CanesandCoffee) January 7, 2018
On another note, I also think that sometimes we as Canes fans figure this only happens to teams that are struggling which is not true. After the 8-1 drubbing at the hands of the Maple Leafs, I wrote an article that is probably worth recycling right now that detailed somewhat similar struggles even for the league’s best teams.
During the game I said:
This might sound strange, but I could mostly care less about intermittent disasters. I think what matters more is ability to rebound quickly and not have runs of it that span multiple games.
— Canes and Coffee (@CanesandCoffee) January 7, 2018
I think the biggest difference between good teams and teams that ultimately fail to make the playoffs is not so much about being 100 percent consistent. Rather, I think it is more about being able to rebound quickly such that an atrocious game like Saturday’s does not quickly turn into 2 losses then 3 then 4, etc. Top teams seem to have an ability to use a disaster like Saturday as fuel to find an even higher gear in their next game such that it is quickly put in the rear view mirror and does not impact what happens next.
To the Hurricanes credit, they did exactly this after the loss in Toronto. The next game was a solid win against a good Predators team on the road and that was the start of the four-game winning streak that fueled the push up into the team’s playoff positioning.
As for the game itself…
The game was eerily similar to the Maple Leafs loss. The team started maybe a little bit slow, but the biggest thing was the goalie (Cam Ward in this case, Scott Darling against the Leafs) to make a couple very ‘makeable’ saves early to buy a little time for the skaters to get their feet under them. The Hurricanes were not great early, but the hole was dug when Ward was beaten to the short side on each of the first two shots. The start really was not that different from Penguins win in that the other team was somewhat better out of the gate, but the Hurricanes mostly avoided the kind of break downs that turn a moderate skating deficit into a bigger problem as a grade A scoring chance deficit. But the key difference was Ward being beaten early such that the team was very quickly in a sizable hole.
I agree with Coach Bill Peters move to pull Ward hoping to spark his team and quite possibly find better goaltending on a night when early indications were that Ward just did not have it. But thrust into action suddenly, Scott Darling had nothing for answers in the first period. When the period ended at 5-1, the outcome was more or less decided barring the 1 in 100 miracle that does happen but only 1 out of 100 games.
The Hurricanes did get an offsetting power play goal from Jordan Staal that pulled the Canes back to a 2-1 deficit and seemed big at the time. But the Bruins smelled blood and kept attacking, and ultimately the Hurricanes were snowed under with the team still struggling and Darling having no more answers than Ward.
In ending discussion of the first period, worth noting is that the first period was not wildly different from the norm other than the scoreboard. The Hurricanes actually outshot the Bruins 12-8 which lines up with what the team usually does.
From there, it is incredibly difficult to even evaluate the rest of a game like this. The style of play changes with more gambling for goals to get back in it, and the flashing alarms from the first period make it hard to consider the rest of the game without bias or distraction.
I will say that another negative is that the Hurricanes never really did push back, but the greater measure for that will be in the first period in Tampa, Florida on Tuesday night.
Notes from the Carolina Hurricanes 7-1 loss to the Boston Bruins
1) Sebastian Aho injury
The biggest thing coming out of the game and heading into Sunday will be an update on the status of Sebastian Aho who did not return for the second period after an apparent leg injury toward the end of the first quarter. He made it off the ice during the shift and stayed on the bench with the team until the end of the period, so here is hoping that the fact that he did not return was merely precautionary given the state of the game exiting the first period down 5-1.
2) Cam Ward
As I said after the second goal, for me the telltale sign that Ward is not tracking the puck well is when he starts going down early (before the shot even) on shots from a ways out without screens. Canes fans are well aware of Ward’s intermittent troubles defending shots that are glove side high. In my opinion, the issue is not at all Ward’s ability to make glove saves. When he is playing well, his glove is fine even if he does get beaten with well-placed shots on occasion just like any other goalie. I think Ward’s glove high struggles stem from the fact that he is struggling, he has a tendency to anticipate and go down early on shots from a ways out when he is better off remaining upright. The result is that any shot into the top half of the net on his glove side now require him to quickly reach upward somewhat against the grain as he is dropping. Making any kind of a save while moving is harder. This kind that requires reaching against where he is moving is even harder. The result is a really high shooting percentage into the corner of the net on off nights for Ward. So getting back to the game at hand, the second goal was a patented example of exactly this phenomena and a sign that Ward was fighting it a bit possibly because of being already being dinged for a goal early or possibly because it just was not going to be his night. He was headed down even before Riley Nash started to release the shot.
But again from the category of context, Ward has been mostly good of late and a key component of the Canes’ surge up the standings. However, after thinking Ward’s effort was ‘meh’ at best in the 5-4 overtime loss to Washington on Tuesday, I will be watching Ward’s play closely especially with Darling still struggling to get his feet under him.
3) Patrice Bergeron
I had Marchand/Bergeron/Pastrnak front and center in the #2 slot of my ‘what I’m watching’ style preview. Bergeron had four goals by himself and Pastrnak added another easily trumping anything that the Canes players could muster.
4) Just need to move on…
I am not sure there is a ton of value dissecting the game much past the first period. Both teams seemed to mostly play out the string from that point forward. As noted above, I would have liked to have seen more of a push at some point by the Hurricanes, but bigger would be to see the team come out scratching and clawing early on Tuesday night against the Lightning which is exactly what they did after the Leafs debacle.
On a lighthearted note (Skate with the Canes is tomorrow):
You don't figure Peters bag skates the fans too for as bad as this one has been? (Horrified look) https://t.co/ezk730lCF2
— Canes and Coffee (@CanesandCoffee) January 7, 2018
Next up is another tough road match up against the Lightning in Tampa Bay on Tuesday night.
Go Canes!
I think my reservations regarding the Pit game not being a turning point are justified (sadly).
Oh my Darling Darling, about as leaky as they come.
I remember last year Hannafan’s grandmother was critical of him in an interview, I suspect tonight he will get a good ol spanking from grandma, at least no hot chocolate. Well, he wasn’t the only one to blame. I truly don’t know where this team was tonight, not in Bean town.
Let’s hope Aho will be good to go Tuesday.
And, as bad as this was, and as awfully embarrassing as it is, I’d rather have 2 games lost by a total of 15 goals than 15 games lost by one goal, 0 points are 0 points, whether you lost 2 to 1 or 7 to 1.
Posting this here, Aho’s injury (the link is safe) https://streamable.com/yovit
I am only glad it is not a concussion, doesn’t look like it is.
Only thing I care about is Aho. Looks like a knee maybe a ankle.
Just hoping (praying) its minor.
As far as the game goes Wards two weak goals inspired the Bruins. There confidence was through the roof. When Darling came in we stopped skating and hung Darling out to dry.
Wards krytonite is bad ankle shots high to glove. Stop butterflying an just let it hit you. Like your idol Brodeur would do.
Its not very often we get out skated but the Bruins were flying.
Move on. Next!
Glad I didn’t make the hour drive to see this one. 🙂 It was -10 last night in NH and was better served watching from home with a warm adult beverage. Besides, I find Bruins fans are getting more rabid. Last year a guy sitting behind my wife and I toppled onto us as the Bruins scored to force OT against the Canes. I think it’s the Patriots effect or winning gets to their heads. Either way, this explains why I grew up a Whalers fan and why I remain a Caniac!
Breeze, I agree. In one of the other threads I mentioned PIT is a shell of themselves and it’s hard to see that game as a turning point. We need that kind of win against BOS, NYR, WAS, NJ (teams ahead of us). We didn’t get that last night.
It’s just one loss, so in regard it’s not a turning point either.
I think a team has mentally already written off a game when down 5 to 1 after the first period, which might explain the lack of pushback, especially a team that feels its overall record is decent and that they can bounce back in the next game.
I hope that down 3 to 1 or even 5 to 2 we would have seen more of a reaction from the canes and we must see fire and fury from the drop of the puck on Tuesday.
Here’s to hoping we lured the Bruins into a false sense of security for the next matchup, and also that the Bruins keep rolling and do us a favor by beating the Penguins in regulation today.
The Canes have been surprisingly lucky with injuries so far, but I expect to see more call ups from charlotte soon. The Checkers fared almost as badly yesterday losing 5 to 1 but their over-all record is pretty good and there are guys who are ready to take the next step.
I’d have to say that Kruger is my biggest disappointment this year. I was excited when he was added to the team, but his defensive stats are not great and he does not score (1 goal at the beginning of a season and a fluky goal against vegas).
WE need a forth line that can not only hold its own but also score goals. Yesterday we desperately needed a goal from the forth line, but it was not to be.
I’m hoping we call up Walmark to center one of the 3 lines and Vogele to partner with Ryan and one of JJ or PDG for a more scoring oriented 4th line (Vogele is also the short-handed goals leader in the AHL so he is at least serviceable on the PK).
It was just one game. Look at some of last night’s scores:
Ottawa 6, Tampa 2
Colorado 7 Minnesota 2
Dallas 5, Edmonton 1
Philadelphia 6 St Louis 3
In the NHL if you have an off night and the opponent comes ready to play it is just a fact you are in deep trouble.
No need to analyze any further. We stunk and Boston was flying. We could have had Sawchuck, Brodeur, or Hasek in goal and it would have made no difference. Let’s move on. It’s up to the coaches to get the team ready for the next game.
The B-spots were buzzing last night. They played a very fast game with some of the hardest fastest passes I have seen. They have found a possession oriented recipe for transition to the O zone that was very impressive.
We weren’t at our dest but just want to give credit where it is due. The cancelled game/rest did the Bruins well and they took advantage of it.
Jeff Skinner is the league’s most frustrating player. On pace for a -34 season. When he’s not on one of his scoring hot streaks he’s pointless to have on the ice. Needs to be a healthy scratch for a while. We’ve been great lately and he’s had nothing to do with it. Let’s see Saarela or Zykov or maybe Kuokkanen is ready for another chance. I’m just sick of Skinner.
BW…I agree Skinner is a maddening player for sure. Great for the goals he scores in spurts (but it’s rarely consistent and goes long stretches without much oomph). He’s a gifted scorer placed on the 3rd line for a reason, because of his defensive liability. Not sure what more there is to reason about him? I know the girls love him, and he’s got his followers, but you have to question 75% of the other time he isn’t scoring? He reminds me a lot of Cammalleri when he was on Montreal and Calgary.
This is why, and to this day, Skinner and Faulk will soon net us players of varying skillsets and character we desperately need to complete the rebuild GMRF has in mind.