A painfully familiar story
The Canes did pick up a point in an overtime loss, and there were some redeeming points from the game again. But at the the end of the day, the Canes lost and repeated a number of common story lines yet again.
- The Hurricanes outshot, outchanced, out-everythinged the opponent except for the all important scoreboard.
- We can debate whether Ward should have given up 0 or 1 or 2 or 3, but at the end of the day, the other goalie saw higher volume and higher quality of chances, gave up less and was better.
- The Canes inability to finish even good chances has reached the level of maddening.
The game featured a strong start (that makes 3 in a row) and an incredibly good first period for the Hurricanes. They dominated up to the first TV timeout at about the 12-minute mark led by strong shifts from the third and fourth lines. Though they did not score, they clearly tilted the ice and seized momentum. Then just like one would hope, the Canes rode the momentum to earn a power play and quickly scored on it. Then they followed up with another quick goal by the fourth line which was the team’s best on the night. The rest of the first period was not as dominant, but the Canes got the better of the rest of the first period and gave up about nothing. Cam Ward then got beat on a pretty harmless shot from an angle (shot was from face-off circle) when his angle was a bit off leaving room right over the top of his glove hand. I think that goal was a turning point in that it gave the Wild just enough from the first period that was not good for them. When it was all said and done, the shot totals were 19-5, and Minnesota had 1-2 decent scoring chances but emerged still in a hockey game and with the last goal.
As 1 would expect from a good team, the Wild pushed back hard in the second period. The Canes struggled mightily to move the puck when the Wild starting sending 2 to Canes with defenders with the puck on the wall effectively skating right through both logical passing lanes. The result was a second period that saw the Canes hemmed in their own end for much of the period. Even still, the Canes did a decent job with damage control under duress and defended in their own zone. Despite controlling play, the Wild managed only 8 shots, but did net the tying goal in the process.
The third period saw the Canes rebound a bit and get the better of things in the period, but after a slow start Dubnyk rebounded, and the Canes continued struggles in finishing also played into a 0-0 period.
When regulation ended, the game felt like it should have been a 3-1 win for the Canes. The chances were there offensively even with the slower second period, and 17 shots on goal with only a few good chances against feels like a 1 GAA for so many other teams in the league.
Even still, the Canes picked up a point and toted their 3-0 overtime record into the extra hockey. But as luck would have it, a perfectly good round of 3-on-3 hockey was foiled by a Minnesota penalty. In all seriousness, the Canes had the better chances early in overtime and did everything but score on the 4-on-3 power play before finally losing after the power play expired.
“Frustrated” would best sum up post-game interviews by Bill Peters, Justin Faulk and Kris Versteeg. I think Justin Faulk summed it up when he said, “We still have to find ways to win these games.”
Player and other notes
Jeff Skinner. I called for a break out game from Skinner with Nash/Versteeg. Right up until the point where the puck needed to go into the net for him, I thought he was very good. He had 2 more posts to go with a point blank tip that just hit Dubnyk and a couple other good chances. He drew a penalty in the overtime. He had 7 shots on goal and 3 more misses/blocks plus 4 takeaways on the score sheet. In terms of doing what he needs to do in terms of style of play, he has been there both of the 2 games this week. I would much rather have that versus Skinner not getting chances or coming close, but at the end of the day, the Canes struggling offense needs him to start finishing.
Noah Hanifin. After 2 games in the press box, he had a decent return to the ice. He was victimized a bit on the second Minnesota goal when he was generally in the right place at the front of the net but never did much of anything to contest any of the 3 players who touched the puck before it ended up behind Ward. But overall, he played a safe and sound game, and he and Murphy earned Peters trust such that they received a healthy helping of ice time down the stretch in a 2-2 game. All in all, it was a net positive return.
The fourth line. Despite limited ice time, the line was the Nestrasil/McClement/Nordstrom line was the most noticeable and aggressive. They were dominant and helped establish momentum on their first shift, drew the penalty that led to Faulk’s power play goal and scored shortly afterward playing a huge role in staking the Canes to an early 2-0 lead. The Nordstrom pass back to Murphy that was bobbled into a quick rush and Minnesota’s second goal was unfortunate, but they were still easily a net positive.
In trying to sit some players and reconfigure the other lines, Peters seemed to completely lose track of how he got there. First, the fourth line saw less ice time. Then he broke them up. Why not drop the couple players who were not getting it done, build 2 lines from the other 9 players and leave the fourth line together? Instead, McClement and Nestrasil saw only about 4 1/2 minutes of ice time after a good first period and were ultimately separated from Nordstrom who moved up. How about just sitting the players who were invisible and picking spots for the fourth line that was buzzing and competing?
Liles/Pesce. They probably struggled the most when the Wild made a minor adjustment to their forecheck for the second period being more aggressive on the puck and sending 2 to basically say “we are taking away the easy short first pass – figure it out.” Even still, they kept most of the mistakes to the smaller variety and defended fairly well in front of their own net.
Cam Ward. This was a game that was there to be won 2-1. The first goal against was from just inside the face-off dot. From that angle, you should be able to take away the short side and at most give up the top corner of the far side and know that is what you need to defend. That is where Ward was beaten when his angle was off a bit. He was not horrible. It was not all his fault. But the other goalie was better, and asking for a 1 GAA was not unreasonable this game with only 17 shots against in regulation and only a handful of decent chances.
The missing. Chris Terry was quiet and saw very little ice time in the second half of the game. Elias Lindholm logged 20 minutes but did not do much to stand out in the process. In my Daily Cup of Joe from 2 days ago, I voted to give not 1 but 2 of the hot hands from Charlotte a chance. You can read that HERE. I continue to vote for that.
Victor Rask. He is fairly quietly taking the next step up. He continues to be very good in the neutral and defensive zones knowing when and at what angle to go to players/pucks. He has been utterly dominant in the face-off circle. And via a decent combination of big plays and small plays, he continues to contribute to more scoring plays than last season.
Justin Faulk. I like the fire in Justin Faulk’s belly. He was under control but clearly irritated in the post-game interviews. That is how it should be when you are up 2-0 and then snooze and ultimately lose. He now has 6 power play goals. Here is hoping the Canes can figure it out soon, but if not he is building 1 of the stories worth tracking if the wins-losses in March do not matter.
The Flyers have been losing, scuffling and grouchy the past few days. That should make 2 of those for the start of Saturday’s Hurricanes vs. Flyers match up on Saturday in Raleigh.
Go Canes!
I agree with your accesment of Cam’s play but I think it time to ask if Lindholm’s weakness is a skill issue or physical limitactions — can we really count on him being a significant top 6 player in the future. To me Lindholm may be capable of more but at some point we need to see it consistently.
You are not being consistent reviewing Murphy — he doesn’t handle pressure & turns over the puck as easily now as in his rookie year — I’ve yet to see his offensive game score or actually cause openings for others on a consistent basis — too me both of these players need to prove we can ligitimately count on to be key parts of this team’s improvement.
Agree on Murphy on the offensive front. At some point, he needs to be a difference-maker offensively. His path to being even a good #5/#6 defenseman is not from converting into a solid, safe stay-home defenseman. Offensively I see improvement in that he is making fewer mistakes, picking his spots when he can rush the puck and is much better at entering the zone with an option other than skating into the corner for a bad angle shot or turnover. But at the end of the day, he needs to use his skating to create goals, and he has not figured that out yet. Defensively, I am encouraged. The biggest thing is that his gaps are much better, and he is engaging the puck more and better. As a rookie, he left a big gap and just kept skating backward until he became a screen or the player with the puck made a play. I also see improvement in his ability to win some pucks on the boards or at least get himself in the right place such that a loss does not result in the player walking right out to the front of the net. That is significant.
Shorter version: I see improvement in Murphy. I am encouraged by his progress defensively. But he really needs to be good if not elite offensively to be a good NHLer.
On Lindholm, my biggest concern is the ‘invisibility.’ If he was out running into to stuff, flying around and noticeable on a regular basis, I would be more patient on the scoring. But that is not the case. He needs confidence, and he needs to play with a fire every shift. The coaching should know better where his head is and how best to accomplish those things, but I lean toward Charlotte.
Have Morris fire him up.
Put him on the best line you can (maybe DGP/Ryan).
Tell him to go be 1 of the best 2-3 players on the ice every night.
I just don’t see what you are seeing with Murphy. I see him panic on the offensive & defensive side whenever he’s pressured – defensively when pressured he turns it over immediately as he tries to get rid of the puck & offensively when pressured he either dumps the puck or shots it straight into the player(s) crowding him – this timidity can’t be coached out of a player – in the AHL he’s one of the faster skaters & very effective but that’s not true in the NHL so fast team know how to crowd him & make him give up the puck as we saw last night & against the NYR. He’s not a rookie & in my eyes he hasn’t used the off-season to add muscle to allow him to be more effective when crowded. Yes, I’d move on from him & look for a puck moving offensive minded defenseman. I don’t see more time in the AHL helping him improve to being an effective player in the NHL – if he adds muscle then maybe.
As for Lindholm, he has not added significant muscle since joining the Canes. He is too soft & that prevents him from causing the separation he needs to get open. So I wouldn’t send them down to the AHL, I’d require he get into a Gold Gym to lift weights twice as long as he’s doing now – otherwise it’s time for the Canes to move on. Skinner invested in adding muscle after his rookie year, unfortunately for Jeff he then started to play a more physical game & his body couldn’t handle the head hits he suffered. I’m not sure if Lindholm ever could play at the top 6 level in the NHL, but right now I think it’s naive to think it’s him squeezing the stick to tight.
This team needs players that will get progressively better with increased experience — these two aren’t rookies, forget their age look at their years with the team. RF needs to decide if he can worry about other roster/organization spots & count on these two players as part of the solution. In my mind, neither has shown they can be counted on.
I am in a quandary. I see myself agreeing with Karash, but I also find agreement with dan0214. 0214 is right on point as far as I’m concerned with his comments about Murphy “panicking” when pressed. I think its time for Murphy to step up his game. Right now he appears to me to have listened to all the commentary from whatever sources (management, coaches, fans, press,etc.) and focused on getting better defensively, but in the process has dropped his offensive game entirely. He needs to be DEPENDABLE, not great, defensively and add much more offense to his game. He needs to look for the opportunities to push the puck up the ice and when he shoots he needs to get the puck on the net. Right now I don’t think he could hit the glass behind it if he was aiming at it. If he does not do this, he will be a lifetime 5 or 6 at best defenseman.
Regarding Lindholm, early in the game I saw some fire out of him, but he then disappeared into the shadows. I will say this. The way this team plays with no one even near the front of the net, I don’t see any solution to their scoring woes. Last night I saw over and over forwards drive into the offensive zone drawing defenders to them. When they looked towards the goal they saw no traffic in front of the goalie and no Cane in the vicinity and ended up either skating back towards the blue line or passing the puck back to the blue line. After the first half of the first period, when they did direct a shot on the goal it was not a wicked wrist shot, snap shot or drive that would cause, if nothing else, a scramble in front of the goal. It was a chip more often than not that the goalie snapped up.
Regarding Cam Ward. Your comments were right on. The other goalie was better and unfortunately this is generally the case. He has his good games, but he is mediocre most of the time. Last night he cost us a game we should have won.