Comparing and contrasting the Hurricanes and Flames youth movements
Perhaps lost a little bit right now in the early season struggles is the fact that the Hurricanes lineup is increasingly being stocked with young and talented players. Not all of the young players and prospects in the Hurricanes system and lineup will ultimately work out, but Ron Francis’ steadfast approach of building from within continues to be promising for the long haul even if the volume of patience required to get there is challenging at times.
Thursday’s match up is an interesting one against another young team whose promising future is built on the back of young leaders. There both similarities and stark contrasts to how Calgary and Carolina are going about building back into the playoff mix.
Similarities:
* Both teams have added good young players through the draft. Calgary has Sean Monahan and Johnny Gaudreau leading a powerful young offense.
* Both teams have also capitalized on other teams’ situations to add good but young talent via trade. The Hurricanes most recent example is Teuvo Teravainen. Calgary’s comparable was when they pried Dougie Hamilton out of Boston.
Differences:
* A striking difference was logged this summer when the Hurricanes shied away from a fairly expensive trade and free agent market at the goalie position instead opting to stand pat at the position bringing back Cam Ward and keeping Eddie Lack. Calgary, on the other hand, added not 1 but 2 veteran netminders in an attempt to shore up the position. First, the Flames traded for Brian Elliott. Then the team made what I consider to be a heady move adding Chad Johnson who was an unheralded and cheap ($1.7 million for 1 year) free agent option despite the fact that he was coming off a strong 2015-16 stepping in for Robin Lehner when he was injured in Buffalo.
* Calgary’s youth features more higher-end, NHL-ready forwards whereas the Hurricanes youth leans toward the blue line.
Hurricanes trying to get on the board in 2016-17
Comparison and history lesson aside, the here and now finds the Hurricanes win-less with a 0-1-2 mark stepping into the fourth game of the 2016-17 NHL season. Three games is still early, but with the memory of a disastrous October/November 2015 aborting the 2015-16 season before it even really started, urgency is growing for the Canes to sort things out and find a win.
A win pushes the Hurricanes to a respectable .500 mark through 4 road games. A loss sees the team probably push to 3 points out of a playoff spot already and looking to game 5 to find their first W.
In addition to the results, the Canes first 3 games have been characterized by early turmoil and adversity. The team blew not 1 but 2 3-goal leads to open the season collecting only a consolation point despite easily playing well enough to win for most of the 2 hockey games. The third game was the reverse. The Hurricanes dug a hole with a 3-goal deficit and then stormed back with an impressive third period only to fall short and lose 3-2. Amidst the results is a team that is scoring but really only because of a single line with a little help from the power play. Also hiding beneath the surface is an incredibly high volume of bad mistakes at inopportune times and goaltending that just has not been good enough.
Interesting to watch will be how Coach Bill Peters balances patience with urgency. The early 2015-16 struggles saw Peters change the lines almost daily trying to coax wins and improved play out of the group. He ultimately found something that worked but not until early December when the hole was just too big.
‘What I’m watching’ versus Calgary Flames
Against that dramatic backdrop, here is what I will be watching against the Calgary Flames on Thursday night.
1) Something to emerge at forward
One of the pleasant surprises early in the season has been the Hurricanes ability to score goals. The Hurricanes have 9 goals in 3 games, could easily have more and have been able to generate enough offense to win hockey games. A superficial look at the scoring totals and other statistics might suggest that the Hurricanes have figured it out in terms of forward lines. But the reality is that the Canes have 1 line that is simply lights out right now and some support from the power play – and about nothing else. Aside from Skinner, Rask and Stempniak and the power play, the Hurricanes have exactly 1 even strength goal (Staal) and an assist (Nordstrom) in total from the other 11 forwards who have seen action thus far over 3 games. Of greater concern is the fact that the Nordstrom/Staal/Nestrasil line has thus far been unable to carry its 2015-16 magic into 2016-17. Nestrasil was a healthy scratch on Tuesday, and Nordstrom might be on the way off that line.
Per comments yesterday on the radio, it sounds like Coach Bill Peters will be patient for now. In my ‘If I was Bill Peters…’ article this morning, I voted to make priority 1 building a second line around Jordan Staal and using whatever players necessary to do so.
It will be interesting to see if the morning skate or the game itself produces some line and/or position tinkering, but best guess prior to those clues is that Phil Di Giuseppe could again see time with Jordan Staal possibly with someone else stepping into Nordstrom’s slot.
For all of the skill on the line, the Aho/Lindholm/Teravainen line has been quiet at the near invisibility level. The trio has exactly 0 scoring points between them at even strength, and from watching the games it is much more a reflection of what they have produced for scoring chances than being snake bit or robbed by hot goalies.
At some point, the Hurricanes are going to need at least a second line to complement the red hot Skinner/Rask/Stempniak line.
2) Goaltending
After a reasonably strong preseason from both Cam Ward and Eddie Lack, the same shaky netminding that contributed to the October/November 2015 demise is rearing its ugly head again in 2016. In 2 starts Cam Ward has a horrible and a soft goal to his discredit to put his team in an early 1-0 hole in both of his starts, and though the sample size is small, his overall numbers and also visual evaluation both leave much to be desired. In his lone start, I thought Lack was the better of the 2. He played well, battled to get to overtime when the team in front of him fell apart in the third period and at least earned a point. I am torn on whether his battling effort and 4 goals against were a positive because the team in front of him was so bad or if the reference point for Canes goalie performances is just so low right now that 4 goals against can look good relative to the average.
Regardless, I do not think anyone is claiming the Hurricanes goaltending as a strength early in the season. Per the last part of my season preview, netminding MUST be at least average for this team to have a chance, and I do not think it has been overall through 3 games. Until we get a run of stable and solid in net, the Hurricanes goalie position is on permanent watch.
3) Heroes under adversity
Despite the fact that it is very early in the season, I think it is fair to say that the Hurricanes are facing their first bout with adversity. In these situations, there is a need for a player or a group of players to rise up and help push a team through it. In a new Canes world without Eric Staal wearing the ‘C’, who will rise to the occasion and lead the way when things get tough? Tonight would be a great time for the new leadership to show itself.
4) A cleaner game
With 3 consecutive losses and 2 bad collapses, I think one could make a strong case for many different things being the biggest problem, but definitely up for consideration is the volume and magnitude of bad mistakes that have resulted quickly and directly in a goal against. There are bad goals allowed by goalies, horrible turnovers leading directly to grade A scoring chances against and defensive zone coverage breakdowns. Collectively, I think the ‘big oopses’ as I termed them in my ha-ha fancy stats column a couple days back have been the team’s biggest Achilles’ heel. Take out even half of the horrible mistakes, and the Hurricanes could easily be 2-1 right now. People often consider this bad mistakes easy to clean up because players just know better. But they can actually be very challenging to clean up. Tactical changes like getting forwards to support the break out better/differently can be worked on in practice and solved via drilling home assignments. But “don’t make horribly stupid turnovers” is not so much a practice point or tactical change. If it was so easy just to make better decisions, teams would not ever have a problem with it.
Nonetheless, the Hurricanes desperately need to rid there game of the kind of plays that can make 5-10 minutes of really bad hockey trump 40-50 minutes of good hockey.
The last round of the current series of #CanesAfterDark starts at 9pm Eastern Time with John and Tripp on Fox Sports Carolinas.
Go Canes!
This losing streak needs to end at 3 in a row. Scoring isn’t the problem (been a long time since you could say that). While defense against desperate teams is a problem, but the primary questions that hang over this kind of start are: Who is out starting goaltender and who is the back up? Does Lack get a fair chance this year to earn #1 or will that position just be given to Ward again (as was done last year)?
Canes and Flames were #29 and #30 in the league last year in save percentage. Flames made some bold moves and brought in 2 new goalies. The Canes brought back the same 2 guys. We’ll see through the season who had the better plan.
Over the summer I was pulling for a Jimmy Howard (ugly contract) + Tatar or Nyquist for a cup of coffee trade. Howard looked amazing last night against the Rangers, stole a game for the Wings. Just sayin…..
Hopefully Lindholm is fired up tonight, to prove he was worthy of being selected in front of Monahan? could use a big game from him.
You’re right about having a young team, but whether they’re really very talented…is not all that clear, is it?!!
Wonder if RF has 2nd guessed himself about his Team-Building-Talents? FA acquisitions (or LACK thereof)- pun-intended, minor/major trades…where were they? Saving his money…for what?
…a rainy day? It’s pouring-down-cats-and-dogs!!!
Soooo many questions…Soooo few answers…HELP!!
Puckgod pretty much covered what I have to say. I would only modify or equivocate as follows: (1) We don’t know yet whether Lack can be the real deal in goal. He started not so good last year and then we found out the goalie coach was tampering with Lack’s style. Then Lack apparently went back to his own style and his stats improved. What we need to see is if he is given 4 or 5 games in a row, can he provide above average performance. To date he has only been put in goal for one game at a time with no chance to develop (and for us to see) a pattern of performance. We have had 6 or 7 years of seeing Cam play and we all know his pattern of performance. One softee and one or more short side goals where he did not hold the post per game.
(2) Puckgod is right to bring up about we’re young, but are we really talented. On this point I would just add let’s give that a little time before trying to answer that question. In other words, let’s not put on the raincoats and goulashes yet, but maybe just keep an umbrella handy.
Just to comment further on grubber’s comments. Would it be a good move now to take Howard’s contract of Detroit and they throw in Nyquist (or an equivalent talent). It sure would be a gamble as far as picking up Howard’s contract but what would we have to lose…5 million a year for 3 or 4 more years (I don’t know how much time he has left on his contract)?
I think that ship sailed when they 1)re-signed Ward and 2) brought on Bickell’s ugly contract instead.
Given the renewed commitment to a goal tending duo that has historically been sub standard and the total commitment to a youth movement of epic proportions, I’m wondering if the light at the end of tunnel isn’t just a glint in RF’s eye caused by the chance of another lottery pick next summer.
Good thought. Such a pick, if properly scouted, would sure help things. His problem with that thinking is most fans (including me) won’t know that it is his plan, and even if they did, won’t be happy with the decision. Game attendance would surely be negatively affected.
By the way, I read on Hockey Writers site yesterday or day before that Ottawa is drawing less than 11,000 fans per game. This in the capital city of Canada, the hot bed of hockey. Article mentioned the availability of an arena in Quebec (probably tongue in cheek).
Nice!!
Bravo, RedRyder!
Great to see chatter picking up with the season here!
Matt, you run a great site here, best by far on the Canes. Thanks!