As we push closer to the end of 2017, Canes and Coffee’s end of year holiday gift sale/pay bills fundraiser is in its final stages. If you are a regular reader, appreciate our daily Hurricanes coverage and have not yet contributed to the cause, please consider a small contribution.
Small $5-10 contributions add up, and for $17.50 out of state or $18.75 in state (with sales tax), you get a Canes and Coffee cup to boot.
It’s as simple as making a credit card or PayPal contribution by clicking on the PayPal link HERE and being sure to include your mailing address if you order a coffee cup.
With the ups and downs (with a few more downs) recently, I have spent some of my Canes’ time thinking about where exactly this team is right now. Trying to boil it down into a neat, tidy and somewhat organized article seems nearly impossible right now because the team’s play seems to run the gamut. For any given area of the game, I feel like I could find a stretch of great hockey and also a stretch of utterly abysmal hockey. Despite the challenge in doing so, today’s Daily Cup of Joe will forge forward and try to sort the wildly differing data points into some kind of assessment.
The Carolina Hurricanes at the top level
Inconsistent: I think the best word to describe the 2017-18 Carolina Hurricanes thus far is “inconsistent.” On average, the team is below average offensively yet has had games during which it looked like an offensive juggernaut. In total, the goaltending has again been disappointing and below league average, but there were games and even short stretches earlier in the year when the goalie position was a strength. And as talented as the defense is, both individual players and the defense in total continues to have intermittent train wreck games that offer almost know chance of winning and also contribute to the goalie woes.
Lack of identity: In a somewhat similar vein, I do not think this team has found an identity and repeatable winning formula yet. They have won with massive scoring outbursts. They had a stretch where they were air tight defensively and eked out wins without much offense. And they have all varieties of good and bad efforts. On the one hand, good teams do rely on some amount of “just find a way to win,” but at the same time I believe that the vast majority of teams that compile extended winning streaks and/or win consistently for a month or more usually have a repeatable model and style of play that makes them better than the opponent most nights. The Hurricanes lack that right now.
Talented: Since the transition has been somewhat gradual, I think many underestimate just how far the Carolina Hurricanes have come in terms of building a deeper lineup with more raw talent. Though the volume of errors and inconsistency can be maddening at times, the ceiling for the team right now is significantly higher than it has been in recent history. If and when that ceiling will be reached is debatable and definitely subject to doubt right now, but the blue line boasts at least five players 25 years old or younger with top pairing potential.
When I net it out, untapped potential clearly exists but having gone 28 games into the 2017-18 season without really finding it, there are no guarantees for schedule or that it will happen at all this season.
Learning to win at the NHL level
Though there are any number of on-ice specifics that can be critiqued, I also think that the past few weeks have clearly illustrated the young team’s immaturity as relates to understanding what it takes to win consistently at the sport’s highest level. Justin Williams who has won three Stanley Cups and does get what it takes has been increasingly noisy in this regard lately. The team has been able to muster the maximum intensity level intermittently but seems to too regularly do the exhale when things start going well such that they go in a circle of ups and downs. Encouraging is that the team does at least seem to be finding the higher level sometimes which offers hope that they will better be able to quickly self-correct on nights when it does not seem to be there. As hard as it is to measure, define or put a finger on, I think a key part of the next leg up in Hurricanes hockey requires a transformation in terms of mentality and intensity level.
The 2017-18 Carolina Hurricanes by position
Goaltending: Unfortunately, the story for the goalie position through 28 games is the same as it has been for multiple seasons now. Despite assertive moves by General Manager Ron Francis to add a new starter in Scott Darling and a new goalie coach in Mike Bales, the Hurricanes are again near the bottom of the league by most statistical measures. And while I do think the performance has been partly due to inconsistent defensive play of the skaters, my estimation is that the goaltending too has been sub-par again in 2017-18. Either for 2017-18 or looking forward, I think the goaltending position will continue to have a huge say in how the team fares. With Scott Darling signed for four years, I think the team needs to be steadfast in giving him every opportunity to get his feet under him and find the higher gear needed to boost the team into the playoff mix.
The blue line: As much as the blue line projects to be the team’s greatest strength, I do not think that has been realized. Performance for defensemen is mostly a function of how many mistakes a player makes and less about how many good plays he makes. A defenseman can have a flawless game through two periods, but if he then has just two bad break downs in the third period and both find the net behind his goalie, he suddenly has had a bad night. And that is where the Hurricanes blue line is still stuck. Because of their skating ability and skill, the Hurricanes defensemen would rank high in terms of how many good or great plays they make during a hockey game. But the problem right now is that they would also be among the league leaders in what I long ago termed ‘big oopses.’ This is where the Hurricanes fall short and also where I think the statistics fall short when they suggest that the Hurricanes should win more often. Shot statistics and even more advanced expected goals type calculations do not yet do not always do a great job of accounting for the quality of shot attempts. Distance, location, shot type and other considerations make expected goals metrics pretty robust, but there is still a huge difference between the kind of uncontested point blank chances that the Hurricanes give up too often because of break downs and a similar location shot that is at least reasonably well defended.
The big challenge right now is tightening up the defensive part of the blue line’s play. Maturity and experience can help, but at the same time very regularly players with incredible skill never master defensive acumen on a consistent enough basis to be more than a third pairing defenseman. So while the hope is that sounder and more consistent play will arrive, I do not think it is as much of a sure thing as some think it is, and the timeline is anyone’s guess. Regardless, the realization of the blue line as a team strength on an every game basis is still deferred and is dependent on fewer bad plays not more good plays.
The forwards: In one breath I can say that the team’s forward depth for the top 9 is as good as it has been in probably 10 years, but at the same time, the team is still short are players who are pure catalysts both in terms of driving scoring and also winning hockey games. Important to note is the fact that it is possible that the answers are already in the lineup and just a step or two away. Teuvo Teravainen recently finished a stretch of play during which he was every bit of a top line forward and scoring catalyst. Sebastian Aho similarly went on a tear. But here the big question is consistency. The difference between being a decent top 9 depth scorer and a true first line offensive catalyst is not about a player’s offensive ceiling on a good day. The difference is how often the player can hit that ceiling and also how much he can produce when not firing on all cylinders and playing at his ceiling level. In that regard, the jury is still out on both Teuvo Teravainen and Sebastian Aho who represent the team’s best chance to build a high-end scoring line. Teravainen is on target for 70 points and Aho 60 which is in the neighborhood of being two-thirds of a legitimate NHL scoring line, but both players are a drought away from more modestly being at the high end of the range for the Hurricanes growing group of decent depth scorers.
Special teams: To no one’s surprise, I would rate the team’s special teams play as poor. The horrid effort that saw two goals allowed both while playing up a man and down a man in Saturday’s loss was the extreme example but in total neither special teams unit has been up to snuff so far. Though I think the power play has been somewhat better at least at times lately, both units still look disjointed quite regularly and have been unable to increase their productivity. And the penalty kill that has been a strength for the past few years under Steve Smith has yet to put it together in 2017-18.
So what’s the outlook for the rest of 2017-18?
At this point, I think it is impossible to predict for certain what the rest of the 2017-18 season has in store. Having to chalk another year up to the gradual rebuilding process is definitely not out of the question at this point. But the highs and intermittent improvement thus far does also offer hope that the team could improve consistency, find an identity, make the necessary transformation in terms of every game intensity level and push up into the playoffs.
I think two things have the greatest potential to change the trajectory of the 2017-18 season. First is a clear transformation that sees the team muster determined and desperate (in a good way) on any every night basis. Second is an improvement defensively that gives the team a chance to win without scoring heroics every night. The defense, especially the blue line, needs to be sounder. It is not that they need to be perfect, but they do need to cut down on the types of mistakes that put the goalie in really bad situations. If they can do that, the onus then falls on the goalies to do their part and find a higher gear.
If nothing else, we as Hurricanes fans seem to also get our fair share of suspense and drama.
Go Canes!
Matt. A very fair assessment. The 17-18 Carolina Hurricanes have been a mixed bag so far.
The bad news is that they have lost several winnable games and should already be in one of the “if the playoffs started today” positions.
The good news is that, as you mention, there is talent throughout the lineup.
Many Canes’ fans are frustrated–or just trying to sound like SHPs (Serious Hockey People). The truth is no one knows exactly why the Canes aren’t 15-9-4. You identify all the reasons that individual games were not won: sub-par goalie play, defensive breakdowns, inability to score.
Carolina is not the only team with these issues. More importantly none of the people trying to sound serious identified before the season that Price, Talbot, Murray would all have save % .906 or lower. Conversely, many Caniacs stated that trading for Duchene or Nugent- Hopkins, or even better offer sheeting Draisaitl would make the team winners. Yet it hasn’t worked for Ottawa or Edmonton. In fact, Edmonton with the best player in the league, Draisaitl, RNH, Maroon, Lucic, and two other top-5 draft picks (Strome and Puljujarvi) has a worse record than the Canes and were shut out last night. On the other hand Vegas and New Jersey are at the top of the standings. If any of the Serious people can explain why Vegas is good and Edmonton is bad–then I will believe what they have to say about the Canes’ mediocre start.
My point is that it is way too easy to rant. And while it may make the ranter feel better temporarily, the rest of us should not enable a “this team is crap” narrative because it sounds “more honest.” The Canes are currently a five-game winning streak away from being solidly in the playoff mix. While there is no guarantee it will happen this month, it is more likely than not. Because the 2017-2018 team has yet to see Skinner get 7 goals in a 5-game stretch, it has yet to see Darling play five games like he played 75 in Chicago, it has yet to see five games where Pesce and Slavin neutralize the top scorers on the opponents. Yet, the ability for all those things to happen exists. Any serious assessment of the team needs to acknowledge the upside as well as the downside.
I realize I am overstating the optimistic case. But with several Serious fans mentioning tanking at this point (admittedly it has been on other Canes’ blogs), there is a need for balance, which you do an excellent job of providing. So thanks for the timely assessment.
CT, very forward remarks you have on fellow posters. Many of us respect various opinions here. Several of us are SHPs as you put it (Serious Hockey People), and some have even played the game. Labeling is your opinion, but remember your opinion is just as good as others.
This team is not playoff bound for a variety of reasons, namely we just are not quite there as Matt alluded to. The fact other teams skipped a step in their development process (Jersey for one), may not bode well for us either. However, this might be the right step in development to ensure long-term success. Many games still to play, but still lacking a true offensive catalyst and veteran defenseman.
Matt, excellent summary, as always.
I appreciate that we still have believers and the “glass is almost full” type of people, the ommunity needs those. I don’t particularly appreciate the labeling, but I’d rather suffer unfair labeling and see the team prove me wrong, in fact I’d be delighted, so here’s to hoping CT has the right off it, and us non SHPs are just doom’s day yelling for no reason.
We can’t assess Duchene or RNH’s current play as their potential. Duchene was stuck with a team he had clearly left mentally for most of the season and has to get acclimated to a new team and a new system now. I still think he could go on a run, and if he had been traded during the off season his score totals might look totally different (then again, they might not).
RNH is a probably a “sour” (at least dissatisfied) third line center on a team too overloaded with top talent (yes, I think there is such a thing astoo much talent, or rather too concentrated talent, we had years of that in Carolina hoping that Ward, Staal and Semin would cary the team o their collective backs).
Basically a goodhockey team has an identity, a set of players that fit that identity, a never-give-up attitude and solid goaltending.
The Devils have basically figurd it out (at least for goodstretcheso this season, )as have the Golden Nights.
This identity can be fragile, just look at Ottawa )last season they almost made it, this year they are in serious crisis).
The Canes don’t have the right mix of players to fit the identity the coach is trying to establish (if the coach knows exactly what that identity is). The tem ha a lot of talent, it just has to get ome role players, fix the systems and improve the goaltending, that’s coaching.
I am still on record as agreeing with the widely held opinion that we need a venetaran defensemen to teach the kids and an offensive catalyst to keep it together.
We also need better special teams coaching, specially powerplay, and Darling has to find his touch.
and
Matt – I agree with a lot of what you write; none of the defects in the team that were noted in the first few weeks of the season have changed. That is troubling to me.
And that leads to one topic you seem reluctant to discuss – and that is the quality of the coaching. We mention players but we rarely discuss coaches as thoroughly as we do the players. I certainly have my own opinions and expectations – curious what yours are.
And I tend to agree with CT. This place is a lot better than most sites. And this is not a dichotomy between “rainbows and unicorns” and “hellfire and damnation”. I really view it as the quality of discourse – there is a difference between commenting critically and commenting negatively. Although I am occasionally guilty of it, I have a low tolerance for negativity. Give me good critical commenting any day of the week! 🙂
I think the success of Vegas and subsequent struggles of Edmonton can be explained, just as the Canes question marks.
Vegas is made up of cast-offs from other teams, some with a chip on their shoulder and energized to prove the teams who left them exposed wrong (not necessarily ill-will, but hockey players are competitive beings). For others this was a proving grounds for them to showcase themselves for the first time. When you have a group of 20+ guys working hard and doing most of the little things right it creates synergy, and essentially they are creating their own luck. Add in the expansion energy and that new building and good things can happen as we are seeing.
Edmonton is missing arguably their best defenseman (a guy we all know in Sekera). Even with Sekera they might be missing a key defensive piece, and we all know the rumors of that team seeking defensive help. This impacts goaltending for sure. Beyond their top two centers, the rest of the team is not very fast and very young. I think the Oilers peaked too soon last year and need better role players (this year’s Devils team may be doing the same by peaking too early…we shall see).
The Hurricanes are in an awkward spot. The core is still very young and inconsistent on both sides of the puck. The role players brought in were part of championship and winning environments, yet that has not helped the inconsistency concerns much either. The problem more so here is chemistry (too many possession guys, not enough proven scorers and lack of veteran defensive presence). This is likely why we are amongst league leaders in possession stats, towards bottom in actual scoring and experience defensive breakdowns the way we have. This likely won’t change until we change personnel.
Livefree. Edmonton is a perplexing team. It would appear that Eberle was a key player. Though writing that seems strange.
Carey Price is an even more unusual case. He is as inconsistent as Darling this year. I have no doubt he returns to form. The Oilers are anyone’s guess.
There is no way I can honestly say that this is a “good” team! When you play hard and still can’t score more than two goals, then…come on…how many times will THAT BE SUFFICIENT?
Inconsistent play, and constant perimeter shooting w/o net presents…equals ties (at best) or 3-2, or 4-2 regulation losses!