After a sluggish 2-1 overtime loss to the lowly Avalanche, the Hurricanes tried again to emerge from the bye week. With the season wearing on the the Hurricanes slowly losing ground in the playoff chase, we are at the point where each game carries increasing urgency until the point when the urgency disappears completely. With a dismal 4-0 loss to the Maple Leafs on home ice on Sunday night, the latter feels like it is rapidly approaching.
If I break the game down, the Hurricanes’ level of play was not as horrid as the score would indicate. But we are at the point where minor moral victories do absolutely nothing to lessen the frustration especially when the game is on home ice.
Recap of Hurricanes 4-0 loss to the Toronto Maple Leafs
The Hurricanes again struggled a bit in terms of cohesion moving the puck from stick to stick. At times, the disjointed play from Friday reappeared. But the Hurricanes played with better pace and at least attacked coming out of the gate. A combination of 2 problems reared their head early and often. First, Curtis McElhinney had a solid night in terms of making first saves. Second, the Hurricanes finishing woes continued. The Canes failed to finish on a few chances and also just could not seem to find a rebound goal on the significant volume of pucks that McElhinney left laying around after successfully fighting off first shots.
The Maple Leafs mustered the kind of opportunistic offense that has been a trademark of Hurricanes losses for years. Despite the Hurricanes getting the better of it in terms of possession and shots, the Leafs capitalized on a few breakdowns and chances and just intermittently banged in a goal when given the chance. 3 of the 4 goals featured a common theme of the Leafs beating the Canes to the net. The first goal saw Noah Hanifin a little bit out of position and then trailing Brown to the front of the net from where he tipped home a pretty pass. The second goal saw Autston Matthews get behind Phil Di Giuseppe at the blue line and score a crazy goal after Di Giuseppe mugged him, took his wallet, took his car keys and pistol whipped him on the way to the net, but unfortunately failed to steal his stick which he used to score a highlight reel goal. And the fourth goal was almost a repeat of the first goal. Justin Faulk and Brock McGinn were a little slow sorting out assignments off the rush, and the end result was a pass right through Faulk to Brown again streaking to the net for his second goal. The fourth goal was a shot through a screen.
Along the way, the Hurricanes actually played 2 decent periods of hockey. The Hurricanes had the better of things in the first period by a modest margin but emerged at 0-0 with nothing to show for it. The Hurricanes were probably even better in the second period but just could not find a goal and were victimized by a couple of the plays above such that they entered the second intermission scratching their heads wondering how they were down 2-0.
Through 2 periods, it could easily have been a different story with a break or 2 but as has seemingly too often been the case for the Carolina Hurricanes in recent years, it just wasn’t. When Toronto struck first in the third period, the air seemed to come out of the Hurricanes decent effort, and it felt like the team mailed in the rest of the game.
‘What I’m watching’ follow up
If you missed the game preview and want to catch up, it is HERE.
1) Less rust
I thought the Hurricanes pace and intensity level was improved relative to Friday, but the team was still sloppy at times trying to move the puck cohesively from stick to stick.
2) Sound defensive play against an attacking offense
In terms of volume of minutes, the Hurricanes were better defensively. But there were still just too many plays where the Hurricanes’ defense was beaten, and those plays largely found the net behind Ward.
3) Continuation from Cam Ward
He was stellar on Friday. While I would not pin Sunday’s loss on Ward with the breakdowns, the goalie at the other end of the rink was better and made more big saves when chances arose.
4) A spark offensively
Despite being shut out, I actually would not call Sunday’s game horrible offensively. The Hurricanes mustered 37 shots on McElhinney and got the puck to the front of the net regularly. But we are at the point in the season when in big games someone needs to step up and finish. That has been a challenge for the scoring-lite Canes of late.
Other notes
Eddie Lack: A small positive from the tough night was that Eddie Lack got some work. He did not look incredibly sharp on the first few shots he faced, but he got better and made it through about half of a period without allowing a goal which is a positive.
Interesting ice time: I do not have the time or energy to dig through shift charts to see if there is a logical reason like match ups, but I found it interesting that Brett Pesce and Jaccob Slavin were both only around 19 minutes which is low for them. Only Brock McGinn played less than Victor Rask’s 12:03; Rask seems due to bounce off the bottom.
Phil Di Giuseppe: In his first game back at the NHL, I would rate his game as more positive than negative. He was on the ice for 3 of the 4 goals against and played a role in the Matthews goal when he let Matthews get behind him at the blue line. But Di Giuseppe was in a tough and somewhat unfamiliar position covering up defensively because the Canes were caught changing. On the positive side of the slate, Di Giuseppe had 7 shots on goal, 3 shots block and 1 more missed shot for 11. The only rap on the offensive part of his game was the same ‘inability to finish’ that is plaguing most of the team right now. If he continues to bring the same activity level, he will do fine.
Next up is game 3 of the 5-game home stand against Pittsburgh on Tuesday night.
Go Canes!
All the “who shot John” aside. the other team’s backup goalie outplayed our goalie. Their forwards and dmen made mistakes, but their man in the mask covered for them. Ours did not. We cannot win consistently with inconsistent goaltending. Soft goals take the steam out of teams and we have a corner on the market for soft goals.
I realize we also have a problem with finishing at times, but are you telling me we could have won that game, all we had to do was score 5 goals? Supposed we had banged home 2 or 3 goals. What difference would it have made? None. It starts with keeping the puck out of your own net. We seem to be saying that every goal scored by our opponents is the fault of someone else other than our goaltender. How much history do we need? We’ve had 8 years of the same lousy level of play out of our goaltending.
What sense does it make to trade for a goaltender (Lack, play him in 1 preseason game after acquiring him, letting him rot on the bench afterwards, extend his contract, have his goalie coach try to reinvent his method of playing goal, let him sit endlessly and play him so intermittently that he never gets a chance to develop any sort of rhythm, and then after not playing him at all for the better part of 3 months give him his “chance” on the road against the best team in the league. To me, there is a big disconnect there between the GM and the coach!
We need to see what we have in Lack for next year. We know what we have in Ward with certainty already. Play Lack! What do we have to lose?
Well said!
Ward sucks!!! He abs Rutherford gave set this franchise back 8 years.
Do some merging now Ron F. Before you divty same!!
Get his ass out of crease, he is pathetic. 3 soft goals last night, this guy has been done for years,
Ryan, McGinn and Phil D, nothing more than AHL players, get them off team, being up others fur a shot!!!!
I had avoided the “sucks” adjective out of respect for Ward’s effort and commitment, but I accept your use of it because team management has brought us fans (including me) to this level of frustration. Of course in modern terms we should say “he has proven to be extremely deficient in the attributes of a highly successful goaltender.”
Another term for being broke is being financially embarrassed. Whether you say Ward sucks, or is less than stellar, devoid of talent or sieve-like, he plain and simple is not the answer in goal. Time to move on.
I completely agree with all the comments in regards to Cam Ward. We all know by now what we have with him – a mediocre NHL goaltender who has his hot spells, but then inevitably returns back to his substandard statistical set points of a .905 Save Percentage and around a 2.65 Goals Against Average. And those numbers just don’t cut it in the NHL. Especially when you have an anemic offense that can’t combat, what feels like, game after game of 3 goals, or more, against you. One of the comments was dead on – when your goalie fails to make a big save (Auston Matthews goal is a perfect example), it deflates the bench like a disease. And in a fast-paced game like hockey, emotion is everything. When Cam was signed to a two-year deal this past offseason, I had a sinking feeling that this season was shot… unfortunately, that’s proven to be the case.
When the train goes off the tracks…???
Just sick of all these AHLers who NEVER TURN OUT TO BE ANYTHING (cannot score worth a crap or cannot even be a playmaker):
McGinn – few good games and disappears
Phil D, cannot hild onto puck, he must be a Staal
Ryan – this guy went MIA
Where is Tennyson?
Bring up Carrick or McKowan!!!!!
Dalbeck – no scoring at all!!!
Bring up Wallmark, give him m a shot!!!!
Ryan Murphy – good news, after all these years, they finally got it right and left him in AHL – Rutherford should take these guys for picks we lost due to his stupidity!!