On Saturday night in St. Louis, the Carolina Hurricanes four-game winning streak came to a halt at the hands of the Blues in a 3-2 loss.
What should not be lost is how well the team is playing exiting December if you look backwards any farther than Saturday night. The Hurricanes were 2-1 for the week, and are 7-2 in their last 9 games. Further, the Canes will enter January in only a single point out of a playoff spot which is closer than any year end in recent history. Yes, the Hurricanes are on the wrong side of the cut line, but unlike past seasons, the gap is small enough that the season will be decided by how well the team plays in the second half not by whether the team can pull off a miracle and make up for a poor first half of the season.
As for the game, I would rate it as ‘meh’ in many regards. The Hurricanes started out sluggish and sloppy a bit like the Montreal game. Only 43 seconds into the game, a pass from behind the net found its way past Klas Dahlbeck and found Kyle Brodziak in between Teuvo Teravainen and Jordan Staal for a quick finish. The first 10 minutes or so saw the Blues playing faster and more aggressive and with the Hurricanes struggling with defensive zone coverage. The Hurricanes survived and did manage to find a higher gear midway through the first period but exited the first period with a 1-0 deficit.
Again, the Blues struck early in the second period when an inopportune Justin Faulk push up in the neutral zone led to a 2-on-1 behind him, and Klas Dahlbeck just kept backing up such that the Blues passed across twice in front of him making it nearly impossible for Scott Darling to make a save on a good shot after having to shift quickly between three different shooting angles. At that point, it seemed reasonable to think that it just was not going to be the Hurricanes’ night. But the hockey gods offered a break to get the Canes back into it. After nearly a minute of penalty kill time with Darling playing without a stick but with no shots on net, a shot just as the penalty was expiring caromed perfectly up the ice to Derek Ryan who was exiting the penalty box. Ryan scored his second huge goal in as many games to get the Hurricanes back into the game at 2-1. When Lucas Wallmark scored 13:48 into the second period, the Hurricanes had climbed back into the game at 2-2 which is how the second period ended.
Heading into third period at 2-2 after playing ‘meh’ hockey through two periods and catching a couple breaks, one had to like the Hurricanes chances to steal a win or at least grab a point. But it was not to be, and the streak ended. The third and deciding goal found Klas Dahlbeck and Justin Faulk being victimized again when the puck found its way behind Dahlbeck and Faulk failed to take away the pass on a 2-on-1. A moving Scott Darling opened up the late-game five hole issues for Darling that have been an Achilles’ heel for him throughout the season.
Notes/recap for the Carolina Hurricanes 3-2 loss to the St. Louis Blues
1) Scott Darling
His three goals against were not abysmal, but I would not call the night a positive overall for Darling. He seemed to doing his best to just fight off pucks all night without much for rebound control on numerous occasions. As such, he looked good on some reflex saves but also just looked shaky again. And the third goal was again the kind he would like back. Off the rush, a good shot into either corner is going to be tough to stop, but Darling needs to make the shooter beat him with some precision on that play, not get beat through him. My attentive viewing of Darling is limited to his time with the Hurricanes, but I hope to check to see if the five hole and other shots through him were ever an issue in Chicago or if perhaps it is just a symptom of his current struggles. In my view, he looks very much like an AHL goalie who is still trying to make an adjustment up to NHL speed such that he more quickly closes up holes when moving and/or challenging shooters. Regardless, the league’s scouts have a very clear read on the situation. Teams are increasingly getting shots off quickly and aiming low. Right now, a high percentage of those shots are becoming reaction saves with big rebounds, and a reasonably high percentage are even finding holes for goals.
2) Dahlbeck/Faulk
As good as the Dahlbeck/Faulk pairing has been recently, they had a rough night on Saturday. They were on the ice and played a part in all three St. Louis goals. The first saw Dahlbeck have a pass get through him into the slot. The second goal saw Faulk have the puck get behind him at the offensive blue line and Dahlbeck do nothing but keep backing up while the Blues made two easy passes and then scored. The final goal was nearly the reverse with Dahlbeck getting caught up ice and Faulk failing to take away the pass on a 2-on-1. Again, the duo has been good in recent games, so hopefully this was just an off night possibly due to the back-to-back set.
3) Derek Ryan
On a more positive note, for the second consecutive game Derek Ryan scored a huge goal to get the Hurricanes back into it. Ryan continues to look capable even if not flashy offensively.
4) Lucas Wallmark
In his 2017-18 debut, Wallmark netted his first NHL goal and a big one at that. About midway through the game, he was paired with Teuvo Teravainen and Sebastian Aho. Wallmark’s game is intriguing with skill on his wing. Wallmark’s general tendency is to hang round in the slot and wait for the puck to show up which combined with his decent finishing ability is a recipe for goal scoring if his wings can handle and pass the puck. For his goal, Aho found a streaking Noah Hanifin who then fed Wallmark for the finish.
I am on record as wanting to see Wallmark get an opportunity to boost scoring for the fourth line. After seeing a decent amount of him in preseason and also one regular season game in 2017-18 now, my assessment of Wallmark is as follows:
–His finishing and offensive upside continues to be intriguing. He showed at the AHL level last year that he can score goals. His natural habit of going to the slot and staying there combined with good sense for how/where to create passing lanes has goal scoring potential with playmaking line mates. But the question is whether as a fourth line center (looking specifically at the here and now in 2017-18), he will get enough help in that regard to capitalize on his scoring ability.
–He very much reminds me a Victor Rask. Wallmark’s game is mature in terms of decision-making and positioning. As with Rask, that enables Wallmark to be decent defensively despite being below average for raw speed and more importantly acceleration. But the challenge with this formula for being sound defensively is that the margin for error is so small today’s NHL where the game is played so fast especially at transition points.
–When I net it out, the upside for Wallmark is that he seems to have the smarts to be like Victor Rask in terms of being a sound two-way player, but there is potential that Wallmark’s upside especially in terms of goal scoring is higher than Rask’s. The big difference is that Rask is proven over an extended time period as a capable two-way player who will not kill you defensively whereas Wallmark seems to have the tool set but has yet to demonstrate that he can translate it to NHL speed without the occasional ‘oops’ that often plagues young centers.
5) Bounce back is critical
Despite playing well, the Hurricanes obviously were obviously not going to win out. The key is keeping losing streaks short such that the Hurricanes push right up to the edge of the playoff cut line does not quickly turn into one step forward followed by one step back. The Hurricanes face another tough stretch of schedule primarily against teams that have been near the top of the league in 2017-18 or otherwise very recently, so cutting losing streaks short becomes even more important.
Next up for the Hurricanes is the first game of 2018 on Tuesday at home against the Metropolitan Division-leading Washington Capitals.
Go Canes!
St Louis saw CAR was beatable today and a perfect opponent to get 2 points that has been a rarity for STL in the near past. Tripp called them “desperate team”; dunno about that but they were able to push the win by will even tho tired, too, as were the Canes.
Even Aho had a mediocre game, ofc that board battle ending up in assist to Wallmarks’s goal was huge, but Aho was on ice during every opponent’s goal, so was TT. Positives were Ryan and Wallmark, all the rest underperforming, esp. Justin Faulk given he should be going by now and show leadership. Skinner is also disappointing atm. Last minute execution was facepalm stuff by all 6 who were out there. They should go see some latest Jesse Puljujärvi goal vids on how to go to the net.
Darling was rusty I think. Wish the quick 1st period goal hadn’t happened but no can do. The coaching staff will face a difficult decision of the starting goalie I think. I would use Ward because metro games coming up next week.
I hope Wallmark stays. I would put Fleury back in. I am certain the Canes will recover quickly. They are on a good path.
I didn’t watch this game – wish I did because I am a fan of Wallmark and would have loved to his first NHL goal. It doesn’t sound like it was a bad game for Darling – just not a good game.
From 41 hits against Pittsburgh to 15 hits against the Blues. As Peters said, Canes looked like they needed a day off. It’s easy to be critical after a loss, but a couple things concern me. First is Darling’s rebound control. Second is Justin Faulk who was on the ice for all 3 goals against; Tripp Tracy has called some of Faulk’s decisions “temporary brain cramps”. As road captain and former all-star, he has obviously been inconsistent at best. Let’s hope he puts it together in the second half of the season. The upcoming game vs. the Caps will be a good barometer for the Canes.
The game was ok in that the Canes again turned what looked to be a poor outing into a “not quite enough” outing. But the refrain is still results matter, so not much to take away. Though I would like to comment on 3), 4), and 5).
Ryan. Because he had so many season prior to the NHL, there is a pattern in his history. The second year he is in a league he increases his production 30%. I think his 45+ point pace this year is more of the same given he scored at a 35-point pace last season. He increases both goal-scoring and assists. My take on that is that he is an extremely smart player who figures out what works for himself and his teammates, then he does more of it. Given his salary, he may be one of the most valuable players in the league not on an ELC.
Wallmark. I was at the first Checker’s game this season. The thing that stood out about Wallmark is that he was talking with the coaches at every break in the play. I noticed last night he was tentative the first few shifts. However, he quickly seemed to figure out what he needed to do–he figured out the defensive zone first then became more involved in the offense. He and Ryan are similar in that they both understand that they are not going dominate with their size or speed. Wallmark would appear to have a higher goal and point scoring ceiling than Ryan. As a third-line center, I think Wallmark could be a 20/55 player. Hard to ask for more. I hope he continues to get time in the lineup as either a center or winger.
The Canes need to get four points out of the next three games.
I do not think there is much of a goalie decision to make. Darling finds ways to loose, not ways to win. He has been hurting us any time he is in a game. He is below average most every time he is on the ice and he cost us the game last night. He is paid to stop tough shots. The game winner he should have had. To me, he is below meh. I was very high on him to make a difference for us. I do not want to see him in net any more. Yes, I know that is not reality as we will burn Cam out again. It is a very high probability of a loss when he is in net. Its been almost half a season and have to call it what it is.
Faulk messed up again. I would have no problem trading him. We could have won the game last night even though we were not running at peak level. Both teams had a back to back, so there are not many excuses. I thought we played okay, outside of Faulk and Darling.
This game reminded me of the Canes loss to Dallas earlier in the year. One difference is that I saw the Canes actually trying to be physically engaged in this one, but early on it was clear that they were just dwarfed in every battle. To me, aside from high end goal scoring the Canes biggest need is that element of heavy-ness that St Louis gave them a clinic on. Also, when its engrained in your system and your players to be heavy you see that even on a 2nd end of a back-to-back St Louis found a way to remain physically engaged and look like the less tired team.
Some of these talented Western Conference teams are just a real tough matchup for the Canes because their physicality limits the Canes speed game. In the past stretch the Canes have made a legit effort to be physically engaged and in my opinion despite lacking real physical players it has noticeably helped. In this game where they were physically outmatched it hurt them. I know todays NHL is all about speed, transition and scoring, but it seems that good ole physical aspect will never leave the importance of the NHL game. A scoring forward like Evander Kane or Gabe Landeskog with that bullying aspect, maybe even Rick Nash, even Eric Staal – the Canes lack that (apart from Jordan who embodies it).
Overall I didn’t hate the way the guys played, and I’ll look past this loss and to a bounce back performance coming up. The one thing this team has proven this year aside from inconsistency is resilience. We’ve yet to witness this group really fall-off the way they’ve been prone to do in the past, so I have faith they will string together some good games moving forward.