The game recap title for Saturday is of course the exact reverse of Friday. After a disappointing loss on Friday, the Hurricanes put forward a better effort on Saturday. They controlled the puck for stretches of the game and won the stat shots/possession battle throughout. But a few too many defensive mistakes coupled with the continued inability to put the puck in the net had them looking at another loss very late into the third.
Then it happened. Goal mouth chaos at 6-on-5 for the last 30 seconds saw the puck bounce and turn and wobble until it finally landed right on Jeff Skinner’s stick just to the side of the net. He deftly pulled the puck skillfully from backhand to forehand and stuck it in the open part of the net for a game-tying goal with 3.3 seconds remaining on the clock. When the Canes ran their record to 3-0 in overtime, Skinner’s tally charted the course from a disappointing loss and 0 points to an exhilarating victory and 2 points in the standings. Around Skinner’s goal was another Justin Faulk power play blast and a nice shot by Jordan Staal to win the game in overtime.
The win was a big one in many respects:
- The fan base. It is no secret that attendance is struggling right now. Putting up back-to-back stinkers at home to run the home record to 1-5 is obviously not a great recipe to improve in this regard. Instead, anyone who had the gumption to stick it out to the end was rewarded with a fun win.
- The week. With the win, the Canes salvaged a ‘treading water’ week with a 1-1 record. If the team wants to push up the standings, it ultimately needs to win more than it loses, but at least the team did not dig a deeper hole this week.
- The team. You can see some of the players pressing a bit with some of the misses on Saturday with a decent volume of scoring chances. Hopefully this relieves the pressure a bit especially for Jeff Skinner but also for others.
My preview featured 3 things:
Cam Ward. One cannot fault 2 goals against, but with the Canes scoring woes it almost was not good enough. The second goal was on a backdoor which usually is not the goalie’s fault, but with a soft shot, he actually got over in time and just did not make the save. But I think maybe the bigger story is how much of a microscope the Canes scoring woes put the goalies under, and in the end Ward’s 2 goals against was good enough for a win like it should be on most nights.
Who plays with whom and does it work? Ugh. The line shuffling has moved to the blue line which has been mostly sound and stable. Saturday Peters tried Liles/Faulk and Hainsey/Pesce. One cannot make a direct cause/effect, but the Canes defense featured a bunch of defensive mistakes that they somehow survived. Faulk had a bad turnover and an unforced delay of game penalty. Hainsey had a couple turnovers. And Liles had a couple head-scratching bad turnovers. At forward, the line shuffling yielded exactly 0 goals. Faulk’s blast was on the power play. Skinner’s goal was in the ‘all scorers report to the ice 6-on-5. And Jordan Staal’s goal was in the 3-on-3 overtime.
Better effort. Though they almost did not get rewarded for it, the Canes effort was much improved on Saturday.
A few player and other notes:
Jeff Skinner
To say that his goal was huge is an understatement for the reasons listed above. Here is hoping that he can use it to jump start his scoring on a longer-term basis.
Elias Lindholm
When you point out at that ‘he was more noticeable’ and claim that as a victory, it says just how far he has fallen. But perhaps it is a start. He was more engaged around the puck and more physical on Saturday. In a recent blog, I compared him to Jeff O’Neill saying that the physical part of the game can be an ignition switch for him.
Too many mistakes
Shot-focused stats are the analysis du jour these days, but very often hockey games are decided by a couple big plays, often mistakes. That was very nearly the story on Saturday. The Canes controlled play, possession and shot totals, but were horrible in terms of playing a sound brand of hockey. As noted above, the reshuffled blue line had a rough night in terms of making bad mistakes in bad places.
Justin Faulk importantly with Eric Staal
Faulk struck again with his league-leading fifth power play goal. Not to be missed was the fact that it was through a screen with Eric Staal again in front of the net. (I think the screen was likely the Ottawa defender who was with Staal, but the point is the same.) He is doing this more consistently and it is consistently leading to goals.
Victor Rask
His game was actually quieter on the score sheet (only 1 assist) on the score sheet than some other recent games, but he played a phenomenal game and was a key to driving possession. He won 15 of 19 in the face-off circle, was good carrying the puck through the neutral zone and played his usual brand of sound positional hockey in all 3 zones. Peters leaned heavily on him for 21:45 of ice time which was second only to Eric Staal amongst Canes forwards.
Next up is a tough matchup against the New York Rangers and Henrik Lundqvist.
Go Canes!
Your summary of the game is spot on.
All of the forwards had a better game individually. They improved across the board with their physicality, face-off wins and puck battles. However I still did not see chemistry from any line that really lead to any sustained offensive zone pressure. In the 1st period the best offense was when Peters double shifted Eric with McGinn and McClement and they did a great job of cycling the puck down low and creating some chances. Hard to understand Brock McGinn getting 5:38 of ice time on the 4th line.
Good to come out with a win – this would have been a hard one to walk away from with nothing.
If I get a chance, I will write it up in a bit more detail in a post, but let me try here in case I do not get to it. I think the 4th line as currently constructed is broken or at least needs to adjust.
The issue is that McGinn’s game is to forecheck hard, and he mostly just does it all the time without any situational consideration. This is not a bad thing and it can work – Ruutu played a game like that successfully. But the issue is that McClement just is not mobile enough through the neutral zone if the first pass clears the forecheck.
The result too often has been if the puck clears the initial forecheck a rush the other way often 3v2 if the puck gets behind McClement in the neutral zone.
McGinn has been on the ice for a ton of goals against. It is not actually that he is making a bunch of mistakes. It is that teams are beating that line up the ice when he and oftentimes Malone get deep and do not win the puck.
So that line either looks real good when they win on the forecheck and create chaos in the offensive zone. Problem is there is not a lot of natural scoring to take advantage of it. Or alternatively they are giving up difficult to defend rushes the other way when they lose the puck.
This was a super win & hopefully Skinner will keep it up — I don’t agree that Cam had no chance on the second goal as he moved slowly to his left & the puck was there to be caught — it wasn’t Cam’s best game but clearly good enough to win.
You are way to generous in mentioning Lindholm as he continued to play soft & showing no signs of being a player that can get open for clean shots — last night looked like Friday for him.
Nash is right where he normally is — soft & easily pushed around with no finishing skills.
We need to enjoy these wins but this team’s forward youth is not telling us the future looks upbeat.